[personal profile] chaosvizier
And so the summer blockbuster season continues with what might be the biggest hit of all: X-Men 3: X-ality. Is it X-treme enough? X-cellent enough? Over-X-aggerated? Find out now!

X-Men 3: The Last Stand



Movies based on comics are vulnerable to hyperbole and exaggeration, simply because that is the nature of comics- everything is huger, more vivid, more powerful, more energetic. Heroes are paragons of humanity, or supernatural entities; villains are ruthless and evil and the embodiment of cruelty. Some scripts follow this simplistic formula to the letter and create simplistic movies. However, some comics have created environments in which there are higher concepts and moral dilemmas to be addressed. Batman embodies justice above the law; Spider-Man is just an ordinary kid who becomes extraordinary; V brings anarchy and freedom to a subdued populace. The X-Men have always been a symbol of bigotry and prejudice, as "normal" humans are confronted with a "mutant" race that threatens them with their differences.

The previous two films address this issue on smaller scales, building up the characters and their interactions and histories and setting the stage for larger conflicts between mankind and mutantkind. This third film explores the larger scale issue: war between the species, with genocide high on the list. And the film does try to live up to its name, "The Last Stand", as fatality soars high on all fronts.

The plot: Humans bad. Magneto bad. X-Men get between a war of baddies. Also, Wolverine turns down hot sex. WTF?

The pros: A movie like this relies on special effects to carry many of its points across, and this series has never been a slouch in that department. Likewise, the continuation of the story is decent, with the original characters continuing their roles as before. The movie does not waste time with rehashing what has gone before; the audience is assumed to be aware of previous events and, as a result, what all the characters are about. The introduction of new characters, both hero and villain, allow for expansion of the armies and a little change when things start to go awry, as they are wont to do. And the issues addressed are heavy: A "cure" for mutation becomes available. It turns mutants into normal humans again. Many mutants think it is an oppression of their rights, and Magneto believes it is a declaration of war, in which the final outcome would be the genocide of all mutants at the whims of "human" government. But some mutants see the cure as a blessing, giving them a chance to live a life free of prejudice, free from disfiguring or disabling mutations that make them outcast. Extra props for Kelsey Grammar as The Beast, though; definitely wins the "Best New Character" award.

The cons: Ignoring things like canon and accuracy and similarity to the source material, the key problem is that this movie is too short. At a mere 90 minutes and change, there is no room for character development, especially when so many new characters are introduced and brought to the forefront. Kitty Pryde is a young girl suddenly thrust into the firing line; her "character" scene lasts all of 90 seconds. Colossus? I don't think he even got a character scene. And while the deaths of Xavier and Cyclops transform the dynamic of the team, even those setups are short and undeveloped. The use and misuse of Phoenix by both Xavier and Magneto is perhaps the only interesting and developed storyline beyond the main plot of humans curing mutants. In other points, the bridge scene was showy but unnecessary, and Magneto's Brotherhood of Wankers was even less interesting than the wankers he had in the first film. The Brotherhood of Lo Pan would have those jerks for lunch.

The verdict: It is good, but it needs more. Ultimately, the worst of the three, which is a shame, because the potential for it to have been the best is definitely there.

Disclaimer: Of course Jean went crazy. The first mutant she met who liked her was a weirdo in a purple suit. Purple! Jebus.

Disclaimer: For a movie entitled "The Last Stand", they sure left a lot of openings for a followup. I can't wait for "Final Fantasy X-Men: Final And Last Mean Nothing To Us".

Disclaimer: "Oooh, my mutant power is writing without a pen! I just think and words appear in my notebook!" You belong in the Brotherhood of Cannonfodder Mutants.

Date: 2006-06-01 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaosvizier.livejournal.com
I think the X-Men using the cure against Magneto is the strength of the movie: it is their ultimate moral dilemma- do they "force" a cure on someone, as the government wants to do, if they think it will save lives and be for the greater good? Magneto is more than a match for all of them together, and now they are leaderless. Their decision to take that final step and neutralize Magneto without killing him is hard. But again, this ethical issue did not get quite enough mileage in the film.

Likewise, the temporary nature of the cure- In my opinion, it makes sense, as Leech's natural ability itself is temporary- it works as long as you're nearby, and then the effect fades as you move off. Perhaps the Cure is a highly refined essence of Leech, and lasts a lot longer, but ultimately fades away. We don't know how long it took exactly for Magneto to start regaining effects; maybe that scene was weeks or months down the road. Again, personally, I think they could have left that out, if they had wanted this movie to be "The Last Stand" instead of "Psych! We Didn't Really Mean Last!"... but that's just me.

Thanks for the cheers; I'll be having a fantastic day once work ends. Cheeky work, always getting in the way of my fun.

Date: 2006-06-15 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angledge.livejournal.com
Do you remember the scene where the X-Men pick up the syringes of Cure & are all looking at each other - looking at Magneto - looking at each other - looking at Magneto? I was HOPING that they were about to have an ethical dilemma! "Can we use this Cure on Magneto against his will, even if doing so will save many lives?"

But no, they were just gloating over having a weapon. Sigh. Missed opportunity.

Date: 2006-06-15 07:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaosvizier.livejournal.com
I think they did have an ethical dilemma. But it, like everything else in the movie, was stunted and abbreviated to the point of almost complete invisibility. I know that's what they were thinking. It just never got fully realized.

The Director's Cut of this movie had better be 3 hours long and with all the stuff in it that would have made it good, or I'm kicking someone in the mutant beanbag.

Date: 2006-06-15 08:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angledge.livejournal.com
Not even a Director's cut can redeem this movie. It had EVERY movie cliche EVAR. Such a terrible script!

Profile

chaosvizier

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 3031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 08:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios