Movie Magnetism!
May. 31st, 2006 10:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chaosvizierAnd so the summer blockbuster season continues with what might be the biggest hit of all: X-Men 3: X-ality. Is it X-treme enough? X-cellent enough? Over-X-aggerated? Find out now!
X-Men 3: The Last Stand
Movies based on comics are vulnerable to hyperbole and exaggeration, simply because that is the nature of comics- everything is huger, more vivid, more powerful, more energetic. Heroes are paragons of humanity, or supernatural entities; villains are ruthless and evil and the embodiment of cruelty. Some scripts follow this simplistic formula to the letter and create simplistic movies. However, some comics have created environments in which there are higher concepts and moral dilemmas to be addressed. Batman embodies justice above the law; Spider-Man is just an ordinary kid who becomes extraordinary; V brings anarchy and freedom to a subdued populace. The X-Men have always been a symbol of bigotry and prejudice, as "normal" humans are confronted with a "mutant" race that threatens them with their differences.
The previous two films address this issue on smaller scales, building up the characters and their interactions and histories and setting the stage for larger conflicts between mankind and mutantkind. This third film explores the larger scale issue: war between the species, with genocide high on the list. And the film does try to live up to its name, "The Last Stand", as fatality soars high on all fronts.
The plot: Humans bad. Magneto bad. X-Men get between a war of baddies. Also, Wolverine turns down hot sex. WTF?
The pros: A movie like this relies on special effects to carry many of its points across, and this series has never been a slouch in that department. Likewise, the continuation of the story is decent, with the original characters continuing their roles as before. The movie does not waste time with rehashing what has gone before; the audience is assumed to be aware of previous events and, as a result, what all the characters are about. The introduction of new characters, both hero and villain, allow for expansion of the armies and a little change when things start to go awry, as they are wont to do. And the issues addressed are heavy: A "cure" for mutation becomes available. It turns mutants into normal humans again. Many mutants think it is an oppression of their rights, and Magneto believes it is a declaration of war, in which the final outcome would be the genocide of all mutants at the whims of "human" government. But some mutants see the cure as a blessing, giving them a chance to live a life free of prejudice, free from disfiguring or disabling mutations that make them outcast. Extra props for Kelsey Grammar as The Beast, though; definitely wins the "Best New Character" award.
The cons: Ignoring things like canon and accuracy and similarity to the source material, the key problem is that this movie is too short. At a mere 90 minutes and change, there is no room for character development, especially when so many new characters are introduced and brought to the forefront. Kitty Pryde is a young girl suddenly thrust into the firing line; her "character" scene lasts all of 90 seconds. Colossus? I don't think he even got a character scene. And while the deaths of Xavier and Cyclops transform the dynamic of the team, even those setups are short and undeveloped. The use and misuse of Phoenix by both Xavier and Magneto is perhaps the only interesting and developed storyline beyond the main plot of humans curing mutants. In other points, the bridge scene was showy but unnecessary, and Magneto's Brotherhood of Wankers was even less interesting than the wankers he had in the first film. The Brotherhood of Lo Pan would have those jerks for lunch.
The verdict: It is good, but it needs more. Ultimately, the worst of the three, which is a shame, because the potential for it to have been the best is definitely there.
Disclaimer: Of course Jean went crazy. The first mutant she met who liked her was a weirdo in a purple suit. Purple! Jebus.
Disclaimer: For a movie entitled "The Last Stand", they sure left a lot of openings for a followup. I can't wait for "Final Fantasy X-Men: Final And Last Mean Nothing To Us".
Disclaimer: "Oooh, my mutant power is writing without a pen! I just think and words appear in my notebook!" You belong in the Brotherhood of Cannonfodder Mutants.
X-Men 3: The Last Stand
Movies based on comics are vulnerable to hyperbole and exaggeration, simply because that is the nature of comics- everything is huger, more vivid, more powerful, more energetic. Heroes are paragons of humanity, or supernatural entities; villains are ruthless and evil and the embodiment of cruelty. Some scripts follow this simplistic formula to the letter and create simplistic movies. However, some comics have created environments in which there are higher concepts and moral dilemmas to be addressed. Batman embodies justice above the law; Spider-Man is just an ordinary kid who becomes extraordinary; V brings anarchy and freedom to a subdued populace. The X-Men have always been a symbol of bigotry and prejudice, as "normal" humans are confronted with a "mutant" race that threatens them with their differences.
The previous two films address this issue on smaller scales, building up the characters and their interactions and histories and setting the stage for larger conflicts between mankind and mutantkind. This third film explores the larger scale issue: war between the species, with genocide high on the list. And the film does try to live up to its name, "The Last Stand", as fatality soars high on all fronts.
The plot: Humans bad. Magneto bad. X-Men get between a war of baddies. Also, Wolverine turns down hot sex. WTF?
The pros: A movie like this relies on special effects to carry many of its points across, and this series has never been a slouch in that department. Likewise, the continuation of the story is decent, with the original characters continuing their roles as before. The movie does not waste time with rehashing what has gone before; the audience is assumed to be aware of previous events and, as a result, what all the characters are about. The introduction of new characters, both hero and villain, allow for expansion of the armies and a little change when things start to go awry, as they are wont to do. And the issues addressed are heavy: A "cure" for mutation becomes available. It turns mutants into normal humans again. Many mutants think it is an oppression of their rights, and Magneto believes it is a declaration of war, in which the final outcome would be the genocide of all mutants at the whims of "human" government. But some mutants see the cure as a blessing, giving them a chance to live a life free of prejudice, free from disfiguring or disabling mutations that make them outcast. Extra props for Kelsey Grammar as The Beast, though; definitely wins the "Best New Character" award.
The cons: Ignoring things like canon and accuracy and similarity to the source material, the key problem is that this movie is too short. At a mere 90 minutes and change, there is no room for character development, especially when so many new characters are introduced and brought to the forefront. Kitty Pryde is a young girl suddenly thrust into the firing line; her "character" scene lasts all of 90 seconds. Colossus? I don't think he even got a character scene. And while the deaths of Xavier and Cyclops transform the dynamic of the team, even those setups are short and undeveloped. The use and misuse of Phoenix by both Xavier and Magneto is perhaps the only interesting and developed storyline beyond the main plot of humans curing mutants. In other points, the bridge scene was showy but unnecessary, and Magneto's Brotherhood of Wankers was even less interesting than the wankers he had in the first film. The Brotherhood of Lo Pan would have those jerks for lunch.
The verdict: It is good, but it needs more. Ultimately, the worst of the three, which is a shame, because the potential for it to have been the best is definitely there.
Disclaimer: Of course Jean went crazy. The first mutant she met who liked her was a weirdo in a purple suit. Purple! Jebus.
Disclaimer: For a movie entitled "The Last Stand", they sure left a lot of openings for a followup. I can't wait for "Final Fantasy X-Men: Final And Last Mean Nothing To Us".
Disclaimer: "Oooh, my mutant power is writing without a pen! I just think and words appear in my notebook!" You belong in the Brotherhood of Cannonfodder Mutants.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 04:40 pm (UTC)I liked Nightcrawler too. He had personality that was interesting. He should have gotten it on with Kitty instead of Colossus.
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 05:12 pm (UTC);)
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 05:25 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 07:16 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 07:20 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 08:03 pm (UTC)And speaking of coming... does Colossus then shoot forth metalclad sperm? "In Soviet Russia, Colossus Impregnates You!"
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-06-01 12:20 am (UTC)Which makes me wonder how things went when he was stuck in metal form for a good long while many years back. Mutant priapism! Whee!
Yes, I think about this sort of thing too much.
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-06-01 01:19 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 11:17 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-06-01 01:20 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 07:35 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 07:58 pm (UTC)Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 08:03 pm (UTC)Then she gives up her powers and no one says or does anything. WTF?
Re: that'll teach me.
Date: 2006-05-31 08:11 pm (UTC)